HRMC loses £653,000 tax battle following administration error
The government department made a very costly administration error in a letter to a tax avoidance user
The government department made a very costly administration error in a letter to a tax avoidance user
HMRC has lost in its £653,000 first-tier tribunal battle against a tax avoidance user after the government department made an administration error in one of its letters to the appealant.
Michael Mabbutt won his appeal against HMRC after the government department sent him a letter in January 2011 saying his tax return for the year ended 5 April 2009 was under investigation due to the fact that he took part in a tax avoidance scheme.
Mabbutt based his appeal on the fact that HMRC wrote in the letter that its investigation was connected to the tax year ended on 6 April 2009, one day later than the correct date.
The tax avoidance scheme user countered that the error “resulted in a stated intention to enquire into a tax return for a year which did not exist”, in which the first-tier tax tribunal agreed.
The tribunal came to the conclusion that the letter sent in January 2011 did not constitute a valid notice of enquiry into Mabbutt’s tax return for the year ended 5 April 2009.
Tribunal judge Jane Bailey said: “Without a valid enquiry notice, there was no enquiry and the purported closure notice has no standing. Consequentially the appellant’s appeal is allowed.”
Responding to the decision, a HMRC spokesperson said: “We are disappointed with the tribunal’s decision and are considering whether to appeal.
“HMRC is proud of our record of winning around 80% of avoidance cases that are taken to litigation by the taxpayer and many more settle with us before reaching that stage.
“We tackle avoidance wherever we see it and litigate where necessary to ensure schemes are defeated and the tax due is paid.”
More about:
In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...
View resourceIn recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...
View resourceIn a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...
View resourceThe first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...
View resourceThe Low Income Tax Reform Group believes the government should have included tax initiatives in its plans for disabled people and employment Read More...
View articleThe revised guidance sets out the circumstances under which trustees need to disclose the identities of beneficiaries to HMRC Read More...
View articleThe accountancy world has reacted to the news that the UK has voted to leave the EU Read More...
View articleHMRC's new leader claims that customer service levels are on the up Read More...
View articleThe European Parliament has given the green light on an EU investigation into the Panama Papers Read More...
View articleMEPs call for more transparency for trust funds and foundations, common rules for “patent box” tax reductions on intellectual property earnings Read M...
View articleHMRC assessed the company for over £50,000 of underpaid VAT relating to the hire of the hotel’s Tamarisk Room Read More...
View articleThe number of investigations into high-value big companies that HMRC suspect of using transfer pricing to avoid tax has fallen by 15% in a year Read M...
View article